Our patent-pending process uses AI agent simulations to create realistic transaction networks, customer account histories, fraud patterns, AML scenarios, wire transfers, customer communications, regulatory filings, and compliance documentation in datasets that contain embedded scenarios specifically designed to test fraud detection systems, validate AML controls, and evaluate financial AI tools.
Seedless' founding team brings extensive experience managing data challenges in highly regulated environments, including leading legal and data intelligence functions at global enterprises where they navigated complex compliance requirements and AI deployment at scale. This expertise in regulated industries, combined with technical backgrounds in AI/ML simulations, uniquely positions them to address the data scarcity problems blocking financial services AI adoption and regulatory compliance validation.
This isn't a generic data company adapting to financial use cases; it's a purpose-built technology from industry veterans who understand the challenges in this space.
Your data science teams need to build and validate fraud detection models, transaction monitoring algorithms, and risk scoring systems, but development requires customer transaction data you cannot access in non-production environments. Building predictive models for card fraud, wire transfer monitoring, or account takeover detection demands realistic transaction patterns, yet you can't use actual customer data for model training and testing. Your models remain undertested on edge cases, leading to high false positive rates that overwhelm investigators and high false negative rates that let fraud slip through.
Seedless provides realistic fictional transaction data, customer behavior patterns, and embedded fraud/AML scenarios with ground truth labels that enable your data science teams to develop, test, and validate detection models without accessing customer information.
Your institution faces regular regulatory examinations from the Fed, OCC, CFPB, or other agencies who expect to review transaction monitoring, AML controls, and customer communication practices. Examiners want to see your systems work on realistic scenarios, but you can't provide actual customer data for testing.
Internal audit teams need to validate compliance tools before examinations, yet lack the diverse, complex transaction patterns that would prove your controls are effective. Mock examinations use oversimplified data that fails to reveal gaps, leaving you exposed when real scrutiny arrives.
Seedless provides realistic fictional banking data—transactions, customer communications, account activities, and suspicious activity patterns—that enable your compliance teams to stress-test monitoring systems and prepare for examinations without exposing customer information.
Your institution needs to evaluate fraud detection systems, AML monitoring platforms, or customer analytics tools that promise to transform operations, but vendors require transaction data and customer communications you cannot provide. Technology committees demand rigorous proof of concept before multi-million dollar investments, yet POC processes stall for months navigating data governance, privacy reviews, and risk committee approvals.
Even when you attempt to use anonymized data, the sanitization process destroys the transaction patterns and behavioral signals the tools need to demonstrate value.
Seedless provides realistic fictional banking data—transaction networks, customer interactions, and embedded fraud/AML scenarios—that enable rigorous vendor evaluation without compromising customer privacy or requiring data governance approval.